::   DT Imago   ::   DT Application Lifecycle Management   ::   Amplify   ::  
dunstan thomas imago header

Archive for August, 2007

The press to be regulated by the FSA – MUPET

Thursday, August 23rd, 2007

Press reports have a bigger impact on people’s decision to take out a Self Invested Personal Pension than financial adviser recommendations, according to a survey by CoreData Research UK. The survey interviewed more than 1,000 consumers with above average wealth.
Of these 47 percent said that reading about SIPPS in the press was most likely to influence their decision on taking out a SIPP, 39 percent would find out about SIPPS online and 36 percent would be most influenced by financial adviser recommendations.

Well I guess this means that the press should now seek regulation through the FSA. I am tickled by the idea of the press taking on a principles based approach to the regulation. Murdochian pension-fund erosion techniques – or MUPET for short should sharpen the attention of the press.

Tax cuts & annuity nonsense

Friday, August 17th, 2007

I was listening to Radio 4 this morning and was pleasantly surprised to hear tax cutting return into the vernacular. With the Tories proposing a policy review filled with tax cuts and abolishing of red tape around the country is welcome news indeed. Lets look at some key points that were made:

+ Scrap inheritance tax at a net cost of £2.6 billion to the Treasury
+ Scrap capital gains tax for assets held more than 10 years
+ Abolish or reduce stamp duty on shares at total cost of abolition of £3 billion
+ Reduce corporation tax to single main rate of 20 per cent at a bill of £4.8 billion
+ Reform pensions system to encourage lifetime savings, home ownership and flexibility in retirement

Well I am not sure who the MP was on the morning programme but I heard him guffing on about the abolition of the “dreaded annuity market”. Is this bozo really serious about taking out a whole market – surely not. Does it mean that the approach to pensions reform is to reduce the choice of retirement products ?

Spreadbetting and CFD

Tuesday, August 14th, 2007

Does anyone have an opinion on spread betting and CFD’s as permissible asset classes in SIPP’s. Has anyone got some first hand experience good and bad. I am fascinated by the juxtaposition of the extremes in risk. Go on – send me a comment.

It’s a race but it shouldn’t be

Tuesday, August 14th, 2007

I note that James Hay are bleating about differed SIPPs being counted as SIPPs and skewing the numbers in the league tables. For gods sake, does it really matter. They infer that greater transparency will enable advisers to make better decisions. Well from where I am standing I am not sure that I see their point. Clearly their anxiety is all about where they stand in the league table of SIPP providers. Isn’t that rather pointless ? Perhaps there should be greater focus on service levels and the underlying product providing value to the consumer. I don’t think this is counted in numbers !

The Anarchy of Excel – as easy as 123

Friday, August 10th, 2007

We spend our working lives working with the pensions industry. We have the pleasure of working closely with administrators and operation people. we know that despite all of the promises that new technology brings the role of the spreadsheet is still an important aspect of peoples working day.

The time wasted working on bad spreadsheets is a bigger practical problem than errors within Excel models, a leading spreadsheet error expert concluded at the recent European Spreadsheet Risks Interest Group (EuSpRIG) conference in London.

Presenting the results of a detailed study of errors in 25 sample spreadsheets, Stephen Powell from the Tuck Business School at Dartmouth College in New Hampshire found that 15 workbooks contained a total of 117 errors.

However, 40% those errors had little significant impact, the research found.
“Spreadsheets are full of data that’s never used and errors that go nowhere,” Powell said. “They are not neccessarily systems with inputs that get processed into outputs.”

On the other hand, seven of the errors uncovered were estimated to have cost impacts ranging from $4 million to $110 million.

SIPP is dead long live ABATIC

Thursday, August 9th, 2007

Another topic of discussion at the recent Henry Stewert Conference was the use of SIPP as a term for pensions that are member directed. Clearly when AMPS was founded the phrase SIPP was not considered even though the SIPP Provider Group Association was half of the association with Pensioneer Trustees (APT) . Quite right too, the growth of the Pseudo SIPP market is creating confusion for consumers. Perhaps ABATIC would be better, A Better Acronym To Inform Consumers !

Service Levels

Thursday, August 9th, 2007

John Moret has now for some time been warning the industry on service levels in the success that has been seen in the SIPP market. At the last Henry Stewart Conference, John spoke about service level problems being a real threat to the health of the industry. The latest discussion on the matter of service levels centres around pensions transfer business.

Again in Money Marketing – Poor administration on pension transfer business is damaging the industry and must be tackled head on, says Suffolk Life director of sales and marketing John Moret. The Pensions Ombudsman’s annual report for 2006/07 showed that pension transfer business was the second-highest cause of complaints with 158 cases, representing 13.9 per cent of all complaints. Moret says he has seen instances of transfers taking up to a year to complete and this is not treating customers fairly. Case summaries in the annual report highlight delays in getting transfer values, transfers and making payments.

Moret says: “It is about time that the industry woke up to the damage that can be done by not dealing with pension transfers promptly. We know that this is a source of huge frustration for advisers and yet ombudsmen reports come and go, codes of practice are adop-ted and yet nothing seems to change. It is time that someone took this seriously. It must be a TCF issue.”

Results season

Thursday, August 9th, 2007

It seems difficult to avoid Standard Life’s PR engine these days as the results season is upon us. I note in Money Marketing a comment was made non how Standard Life boasted fantastic sales figures earlier this week particularly on the individual Sipp front with sales of £2.5bn but as with most results, the devil is in the detail. The article then went on to say that then when you delve a bit further it turns out that the life office also paid out £3.6bn in claims which could mean they are simply recycling existing pensions business into new business.

ASP automated or not

Wednesday, August 8th, 2007

I came across this change to USP/ASP rules introduced in the Finance Bill 2007. Basically there is no automatic movement of funds from a USP to an ASP at the members 75th birthday. I suppose this was inevitable given the introduction of a minimum income limit for ASP.

16. Paragraph 11 inserts new sub-paragraphs (6) and (7) into
paragraph 11 of Schedule 28 to FA 2004, which introduce new
provisions for members of registered pension schemes who
cannot be traced by their 75th birthday. Paragraph 11 of Schedule
28 provides for the conditions that apply for sums and assets to
become held in an ASP fund on the member’s 75th birthday.
Funds that were held in an unsecured pension fund immediately
before the member’s 75th birthday are treated as becoming held as
an ASP fund when the member reaches age 75. The changes
introduced by paragraph 11 of the Schedule will mean that for
HM REVENUE AND CUSTOMS FINANCE BILL 2007
CLAUSE 68
SCHEDULE 19
members that the scheme administrator can not trace by their 75th
birthday, their funds will not automatically be treated as
becoming held in an ASP fund at that point.
!” New paragraph 11(6) of Schedule 28 provides the conditions
for funds to become held under the separate provisions for
untraceable members. These are that a scheme administrator
has taken reasonable steps to trace a member and has been
unable to find them. There is also a requirement that no part
of the funds in the arrangement were treated as being
designated into unsecured pension, other than by the
operation of paragraph 8(2) of Schedule 28.
!” New paragraph 11(7) of Schedule 28 provides that where the
conditions of new paragraph 11(6) of Schedule 28 apply then
the sums and assets in the member’s pension fund will not
become held as an ASP fund on the member’s 75th birthday.
Such funds having previously been designated into unsecured
pension by virtue of paragraph 8(2) of Schedule 28 to FA
2004, will effectively remain in suspense unless the member
is subsequently traced. While the funds remain in suspense,
any payments from the fund will be unauthorised, because
they are not within one of the forms of benefits set out in
Pension rule 6 in section 165(1) of FA 2004. Where a
member who was untraceable at age 75 is subsequently
traced, then if their funds have not, within six months, been
used to purchase or provide a scheme pension or annuity,
they will at that point be treated as becoming held as an ASP
fund. The ASP provisions, including the minimum income
requirement, will then start to apply.


Copyright © 1986-2012 Dunstan Thomas Holdings Limited
Disclaimer, Terms and Conditions