migration « DT Imago Blog

Posts Tagged ‘migration’

CIP migration could be another RDR-linked banana skin for IFAs, warns FSA

Thursday, April 26th, 2012

The FSA’s latest Guidance consultation linked to Centralised Investment Propositions (CIP) and Replacement business broke earlier this month and is already attracting much comment in the ‘Twitterverse’ and in the financial trades.

It focuses on the advisory process around selection of discretionary investment management, portfolio advisory services and distributor-influenced funds by advisors for their customers. RDR has demanded IFAs review their ways of working. Many have fixed on new strategies in order to secure their futures in the commission-free Adviser Charging world which will be forced on them in just over seven months time.

(more…)

Abolition of compulsory annuities proves most popular Pensions Reform according to new IFA survey by Dunstan Thomas

Friday, June 17th, 2011

Dunstan Thomas survey garners views from over 16,000 IFAs as they prepare for RDR and Wrap Platform Asset Migration Boom

IFAs think the abolition of compulsory annuities will benefit the consumer more than any other major Pension Reform being pushed through this year. 39% of IFAs questioned in last month’s online survey considered this the most beneficial reform while 30% selected auto enrolment as the most beneficial reform for consumers. One in five (20%) said that unbundling of charges would deliver the most benefit.

Over two thirds of IFAs (69%) think the new qualification and training requirements demanded of them by RDR, renders provision of independent financial advice to the mass market quite simply unaffordable.
Increasing transparency around charges is broadly welcomed by IFAs – over three quarters of them (77%) backed full unbundling of charges and 62% gave the thumbs up to clear communication of the impact of charges on performance or Reduction in Yield as it is sometimes called.

But understandably IFAs are divided on the merits of banning commission payments – over two thirds (68%) remain against this move; while 72% stated that the FSA’s judgement that selecting only one wrap platform for the transfer of assets of the majority of clients will have a’ negative impact’ for clients.
They also think that the FSA’s tight definitions of Independent and Restricted advice is not the way to go – 72% thought the FSA had got these definitions wrong.

The audience was virtually split down the middle by some of the other disclosure related changes: 44% said that banning of cash rebates from providers to advisers was the right move while 47% said banning of cash rebates from fund managers to platforms (now widely expected by the industry) was a good move.

Three quarters of the sample intend to remain whole of market IFAs after RDR despite the increasing demands being placed on them; while nearly half (43%) think that 16-25% of IFAs will cease trading because of the new demands placed on them by RDR and 20% think 26-40% of IFAs will disappear.

Despite the pressures imposed by RDR the single largest financial pressure being placed on IFAs this year is actually coming from rising levies being exacted by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme to compensate clients for assets lost as a result of an increasing number of investment firms that are failing – 39% put this issue as the largest drain on their coffers in 2011, whereas 24% cited RDR preparations as the most costly area this year. Transitioning from commission to fee-based advice was the largest financial pressure for 22% of firms questioned.

But it is not all gloom and doom so where are IFAs seeing growth this year? Asset Migration onto wrap platforms is seen as the key growth strategy for 16% of firms while 12% see ‘deepening our expertise in a particular area of the market’ as the route to growth. A slightly smaller number (11%) are outsourcing more aspects of what they do to specialists (e.g. Discretionary Fund Managers) to find efficiencies. 10% are acquiring new business by buying other IFA firms as the consolidation trend picks up pace.

The most significant criteria for wrap platform selection was range of funds and fund managers on offer (with a weighting of 77), closely followed by service levels (69) and unbundling of charges capability (45).
In terms of specific functionality ‘Good selection of risk profiling, planning and rebalancing tools’ was voted the most important factor in wrap selection by 30% of respondents. Online transacting capability was the second most important functional requirement (25%); while strong integration with ‘our existing Front Office and desktop systems’ came in third (16%).

Wrap asset migration speed and progress is also worthy of exploration and the figures show some acceleration in asset migration activity:
• 15% have moved 11-20% of customer assets under management onto wraps already.
• 9% have moved 21-30%
• 15% have moved 31-40%
• 10% have completed 41-50%
• A further 10% have completed 51-60%

But if you ask what percentage of assets they expect to have moved at the end of the migration process the figures are much higher:
• Nearly a third (29%) will move more than 70% of assets
• 16% will move 61-70%
• 13% will move 51-60%

The majority of IFAs expect a near tripling of the total Assets Under Management (AUM) on platform within the next 18 months: 37% predicted £300bn of AUM will be on platform by the end of 2012, up from £120bn today. An even higher number (40%) predict a doubling of AUM over the next 18 months to reach £200bn which is significant in itself.

And those assets won’t just be in investment funds and cash, 62% of IFAs think a range of annuities should be offered on platforms and would purchase this way if it was available. Over half of the sample (52%) thinks that the value of the annuity market will stay the same as it is today or grow despite the advent of the abolition of compulsory purchase of annuities at age 75.

Over half of IFAs (51%) said that wrap platforms need to get better at enabling quick and easy re-registration of assets between platforms. Re-registration capabilities are required by the RDR deadline of 31st December 2012 and the technology is already there to deliver it. Considerable industry pressure demanding this capability has led most platforms to prioritise this capability in recent months.

Chris Read, chairman, Dunstan Thomas, commented on the findings:
“This is the most comprehensive snapshot we have ever commissioned into the views of the bulk of the IFA market. It gives us a great insight into a market which is changing fairly rapidly as hundreds of billions of pounds of assets move from legacy policies onto wrap platforms.

“We also see the consolidation trend accelerating, while those looking for growth are deepening expertise and using technology and specialist outsourced service providers to serve customers more efficiently and proactively. Although RDR looks tough for IFAs right now, it is already driving many firms to plan how they can serve more customers better and transform their businesses by so doing.”

Dunstan Thomas commissioned Agility PR to fulfil the above survey of 16,340 IFAs. Agility PR sent questionnaires via an online survey provider and obtained a total of 127 fully completed questionnaires within a two week period between 21st April and 5th May 2011. This equates to a response rate of 0.76%.

2010 Survey

Monday, February 15th, 2010

Over the past six years, we have conducted industry surveys every year, these surveys provide content or industry comment in the press and a booklet that is produced in the middle of the year. The surveys get issued to providers as well as advisers. This provides an interesting comparison of often contrasting views. Last year we did a survey on asset migration and wrap platforms.

This year the topic for the surveys covers aspects around communications to clients issues around the pensions thematic review, opinions on issues such as regulation and Solvency II. If you receive a survey from us, please do have a look at the questions and provide response to us. The more opinions we get the better the quality of the response.

Drop me a line in this blog if you would like us to followup any burning issues on your mind. cread@dthomas.co.uk

Asset Migration & Imago RIY Plus

Monday, February 15th, 2010

http://www.dthomas.co.uk/imago/illustrations/riyplus.html

During the course of the past year, Imago Front Office has been developed further for specialist asset transfer company Legacy Asset Systems. The Front Office team has developed the RIY Plus calculator to provide cost comparison facilities and suitability reporting.

(more…)

TCF Failures

Friday, June 5th, 2009

Christopher Read, chairman of pensions software company Dunstan Thomas, said advisers should be cautious about the way they transfer their clients onto a wrap platform

He said the regulator underlined concerns around customer migration strategies of adviser firms.

Mr Read said: “The survey indicates that 71 per cent of IFAs may be in breach of treating customers fairly by selecting specific groups of customers to migrate to wrap rather than explaining the pros and cons of wrap to all customers and helping them to make the right decision for them.”

He said a comment on this issue made by the FSA had underlined concern about customer migration strategies of adviser firms.

It said: “If advisers do not offer wrap when it is considered to be suitable, that may call into question the suitability of their recommendation.”

One of the reasons for some advisers only transferring new clients into wraps may be to do with the burden of transfer existing assets onto the platforms, Mr Read said.

Wrap IFAs expect to migrate at least 80% of their customers

Monday, March 2nd, 2009

Wrap IFAs expect to migrate at least 80% of their customers, finds new
Dunstan Thomas survey

A telephone survey of wrap platform-using financial advisers, commissioned by Dunstan Thomas last month, reveals that nearly three quarters (73 per cent) of IFAs that are using wrap platforms today, expect at least 80 per cent of their customer-base to move their assets onto their selected wrap platform. Most firms expect to have completed migration work by the end of 2010.

The main criteria for selection of a wrap platform is the quality of service being offered by platform providers (53 per cent of the sample saw this as their most important criteria). The second most significant criteria for wrap selection was the breadth of investment choices being offered (26 per cent said this was the key criteria for selection). Nearly three quarters (73 per cent) of firms have offered clients’ investment trusts for the first time as a result of wrap migration. The offer of an unbundled and transparent charging structure was the next most important issue for wrap platform users (20 per cent).

Difficulties involved in migrating assets onto wrap still remain with the movement of legacy assets from life assurers’ being cited as the primary frustration (by 53 per cent). The second largest frustration remains the fact that several platforms do not universally accept in specie transfers (26 per cent).

The majority of IFAs agreed that moving onto wraps had enabled them to offer a more holistic service to their customers whilst cutting their administrative burden significantly.

James Roberts at Partners Wealth commented on the benefits to his firm: “Wrap platform migration has enabled us to lay down and communicate our service proposition to clients very clearly. We now guarantee an annual review meeting for all wrap clients. We also offer six monthly reviews, combined with clearly defining all clients’ risk profiles and offering continuous, even daily, valuations via our website which is powered by one of the platforms.”
Andy Jervis of Chesterton House, explains: “Wraps have enabled us to pre-agree Client Remuneration based on a simple and understandable charging structure and to only charge for service and expertise rather than to execute a transaction. We can now tell the client exactly what percentage of Assets Under Management they are paying us, the wrap and the fund manager, annually and per transaction. This kind of transparency also enables us to be both more flexible and more consistent with our charging.”
Christopher Read, chairman, Dunstan Thomas, commented:
“It is quite clear that the converts to wrap platforms are already deriving considerable benefits in terms of the service and range of broadening investment choices they’re able to offer their clients. The fact that the majority of their client-base is happy to migrate their assets to their adviser’s-selected wrap reveals a great deal about their increasing success.”

Evolution of the platform market in the UK

Friday, February 27th, 2009

How do you see the platform market evolving in the UK? Can you see platforms becoming a vital part of how advisers do business?

Our research into advisers who are already doing business through the platforms suggests that firms which are migrating clients onto wrap platforms are already reaping real benefits. The majority of IFAs said that moving clients onto a platform had enabled them to offer a more holistic service whilst cutting their administrative burden significantly.
Using platforms, advisers are often able to offer their clients a wider range of investment options. Unbundled and transparent charging offered by ‘deep’ wrap platforms was also seen as a real advantage to IFAs striving to be paid through fees for advice rather than via commission payments.
Some are even using wrap migration as the catalyst for laying out their service proposition to clients very clearly for the first time – meeting clients face to face more regularly, defining clients’ risk profiles and offering continuous, even daily, valuations via the chosen platform.
All these benefits generate real customer benefits very fast. The IFAs we spoke to are seeing an average of four out of five of their clients migrating their assets across to a wrap when the benefits have been fully explained to them.
Most people believe that migration to wraps will accelerate over the next two years as platform providers improve their offerings and both the costs and time-scales, associated with migrating assets onto them, continue to fall. We personally think that deep wraps offerings have a very bright future and this perhaps explains why we are still seeing new platform offerings coming to market recently.

Money in them there hills – the opportunity of legacy asset migration

Monday, December 22nd, 2008

The economic cycle we find ourselves in has challenged the savings industry. There is not a great deal of new money comming into the market. With falling portflio valuations, and nightmare economic scenarions being played out it is hardly surprising.

A beam of hope for the industry is in the massive book of untapped value in legacy assets. These are assets in which there is no active advice being performed for the clients interest. There is a further argument that states that TCF disciplines are not being performed on these clients.

Let’s look at the size of the opportunity. There are about 24,000 advisers in the UK, each with an average of £15 million AUM. Effectively this means there are £350 billion of AUM through the advice channel. It is calculated that active advice is being performed on £150 billio (i.e. those assets that have migrated to a platfrom). This leaves £210 billion as legacy assets.

The challenge now is how to create a process that is industrialised enough to provide business intelligence to present convincing arguemtns for migration of legacy assets into an environment that is being actively managed and enhanced.

Treating Customers Fairly (TCF) and wrap migration

Tuesday, April 8th, 2008

Following a survey Dunstan Thomas has recently run, findings point to a potential falling foul of the TCF rules.
53% of the survey sampled are actively revisiting selected clients to assess whether to move them to a platform. 25% are moving only new clients to platforms. Only 20% are re-visiting all of their clients.
Effectively 71% may be in breach of TCF by automating the migration of clients as opposed to assessing the pros and cons of wrap to all clients.



Subscribe

Subscribe to the Blog Feed